Net Neutrality and Bitcoin – Juggling with Digital Political Explosives

Net neutrality Goodbye: In the USA, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) this week took a decision to soften the current legal provisions regarding the neutrality of data access on the Internet. In concrete terms, this means that data flows will be available for purchase in the future. In the future, providers and Internet providers will be able to charge customers for faster data flows and throttle content. The authority is thus intervening in one of the democratic primal principles of the World Wide Web: The free availability of data. Critics see this as a gloomy omen – even for crypto currencies.

Here are digital political explosive Bitcoin news

Net neutrality, a pillar of the free Internet, is on the verge of collapse. For a long time, hardly any other Bitcoin news concept has been as controversial between internal idealists and competition-oriented pragmatists as the unwieldy bureaucratic word. But what is behind the Bitcoin news?

In essence, the concept of net neutrality refers to the equal treatment of all data on the Internet – whether video streaming, cloud data or telephone calls, regardless of sender, receiver or other framework conditions. This was intended to ensure non-discriminatory competition on the Internet for a long time to come.

However, network operators in particular have always rejected the concept and demand more control over data transmission. They want to transmit data of varying quality on their networks and argue that this could prevent data congestion. This should become possible this week.

The end of the free Bitcoin news?

Because last Thursday the US-American FCC took a big step in the direction of the Bitcoin news network operators, softened the neutrality of the network and harvested a lot of criticism:

With a narrow majority, the telecommunications supervisory authority has backed the change in the regulations that have been in force to date. In the future, network operators will be able to give preference to offers based on customer tariffs and restrict others.

Critics see red: They fear the monopolisation of data access in view of the enormous purchasing power of corporations. They could prioritize their data for payment through the veins of the network and thus displace independent offers. Thinking into the future, this could not only lead to the advantage of wealthy customers. The triggering of the free flow of data is often seen as a danger of political censorship, market influence and interference with the freedom of the press.